>
SRF Walrus
Mt. Washington, Ca
Open discussions about SRF
Gold Community SRF Walrus
    > Treatment of Members/Monastics
        > Cult thinking inside SRF - Don't ever tell!
New Topic    Add Reply

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Author Comment
KS
Registered User
(6/7/02 6:10 am)
Reply
Cult thinking inside SRF - Don't ever tell!
Google has a directory of Walrus-like sites:
directory.google.com/Top/...iews/Yoga/

While they are usually discussing other organizations, many of the same views are expressed on these sites as are seen here. These sites help us to see that what has happened at SRF is nothing new. Cults often develop from well intentioned people but they have common traits. I found it helpful for me to understand the patterns of behavior inside SRF for what they are, a mind control cult. They are not as pressuring as some on outside members, but worse than many on insiders.

hometown.aol.com/shawdan/essay.htm
Quote:
It was hearing these words, "Don't ever tell," that broke for me what Ernst Becker (1973) has called "the spell cast by persons -- the nexus of unfreedom." As I began to explore my experiences and those of others in connection with SYDA, I realized that because I had accepted the leader's claims to perfection and enlightenment, I had been unable to recognize abuses in the ashram for what they were.

more from this website
Quote:
Thought reform (also known as mind control) is the foundation on which cults are built. Lifton identified 8 phenomena that were present in the systems of "ideological totalism" that he studied, all of which can be found in cults:
1.        Milieu control - control of communication within an environment. Maintained primarily by increasingly isolating members from non-members, this sets up what Lifton calls "personal closure." One is constantly receiving reinforcement to suppress personal doubts and struggles about what is true or real;
2.        Mystical manipulation, or planned spontaneity - a systematic process, covertly planned and managed by the group leader, whereby others come to invest him with omniscience, omnipotence, or divine authority. This gives rise to the embrace of an "ends justify the means" philosophy, since the behavior and directives of the leader are always and only interpreted as having a divine origin and purpose;
3.        Demand for purity - the call for a radical separation of pure and impure, of good and evil, within an environment and within oneself. This creates a world of guilt and shame in which devotees become obsessively preoccupied with hope of reward and fear of punishment;
4.        Cult of confession - linked to the demand for purity. Required confession sessions, ostensibly for the purpose of purification and spiritual evolution, manipulate the guilt and shame mechanisms of followers, expose them totally to the group, and deepen their sense of being owned by the group;
5.        Sacred science - a set of dogmatic principles which claim to be a science embodying the truth about human behavior and human psychology. These principles must never be questioned, and all experience must be filtered through them;
6.        Loading the language - reduction and distortion of complex concepts, thoughts, and feelings to simplistic cliches and slogans, which are used to still and limit mental processes of judgment and critical thinking;
7.        Doctrine over person - one is made to feel that doubts of the doctrine are a reflection of one's own inadequacies, defects, or sins. The dogma is truth, and one's subjective experience must be aligned with the dogma. To do otherwise is to risk exclusion from the group. Since the doctrine is created to serve the purposes of the sociopathic leader, followers must split off or dissociate parts of themselves, and jettison their own values, to justify actions or tenets of the leader which would otherwise be intolerable to them.
8.        Dispensing of existence - in the totalist vision of truth, one who disobeys, or deviates from the dogma, is false, deluded, or evil, and therefore instantly dispensable. The leaders are the judge of who is deviant, and can change their criteria at whim. Cults use the fear of banishment and shunning to control and contain members. To fear rejection by one's absolute ideal is tantamount to the profound dread of annihilation. (See also Singer and Ofshe, 1990; Tobias et al. For other theories of social control relevant to cults, see Festinger, 1964; Gramsci, 1973; Zimbardo, 1988.)


"The ultimate effect of these techniques is to convince the victim that the perpetrator is omnipotent, that resistance is futile, and that her life depends upon winning his indulgence through absolute compliance. ... More than just being between a rock and a hard place, this is a desperate and degraded position to find onesself in.

Coldly familiar stuff isn’t it? Of course the perpetrator in this case is NOT Master, it is the closed cult leadership (the bad ladies) and the hangers on who feed off their total power.

Edited by: KS at: 6/7/02 6:21:02 am
Daya Yama
Registered User
(6/23/02 7:58 am)
Reply
Cult thinking may be superceded
KS, I liked your informative letter on cults and many of their general means to grow and prosper on behalf of group members.

It seems you mean that SRF is a cult with one or more of these marks, among others:

They exclude others.
They take to dispensing methods.
They take to reductionist thinking and such language to accomplish one or more general aims.
They function in step with separating members from those outside.
They bring ideological totalism to members and use reinforcements that shame some of those who don’t conform enough.
There is simplistic thinking used for furthering mind-control as needed.

(1) MY RESERVATIONS: I for one can’t say solid “Ay and Yes” to all of the points here. (2) LIKERT SCALE: I also think a divisioning of the responses must be nuanced to do better service; that is, instead of responding "Yes" and "No", there may be room for ""emphatic yes", "cool yes", "don't know" in the middle, and "cool no", and emphatic no" in the other end. This is the basis of the Likert scale. It is often resorted to in social science, to get a firmer hold somehow. I just mention it. I think RajaBegum is into things like that. I have to check in time.

PROBLEM

"Show me a man without problems . . ."

Because SRF doesn’t function so well, one way or another, we may experience various troubles. Many who have been dismayed, disillusioned and the like, think there is strength in union somehow. And do we consider well enough what made us enter SRF one way or another and complement guiding personalities there? How far was it due to hidden facets of our own nature, for example? “It takes two to a tango.”

If the holding together was deeply sought through some sides of our own nature, such as loneliness and so on, the centre of the trouble of tearing our bleeding hearts away from the present SRF (management), could be something in us that complements something in SRF.

What seems to be much needed is to make oneself strong or firm to withstand being guided or pushed around in the first place. Firm enough to withstand guides who mean to help, who pose as helpers and guides, but who may have too simple ideas to be a real help in the long run. But that is hypothetical. What I call for is sound introspection as to our own parts of the SRF tango.

Next, what are the STEPS to take to gain proper self-assertiveness and adjustments, even though feeling shaky inside for a long time?

How do we hold on to our various, separate gains without further misfortunes? We may fall short of something important if we just band together, giving one another more or less simplistic solutions in the cobweb of feelings and things to tackle, if subservience or insecurity brought us into the arms of guides in the first place.

How may we hold on and live in dignity after traumatic experiences of this sort?

Daya Yama

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies Click to receive email notification of replies
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies Click to stop receiving email notification of replies
jump to:

- SRF Walrus - Treatment of Members/Monastics -



Powered By ezboard® Ver. 7.32
Copyright ©1999-2005 ezboard, Inc.