>
SRF Walrus
Mt. Washington, Ca
Open discussions about SRF
Gold Community SRF Walrus
    > Treatment of Members/Monastics
        > Merton's book and SRF leaders
New Topic    Add Reply

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>
Author Comment
chuckle chela
Registered User
(3/24/02 10:42 pm)
Reply
Merton's book and SRF leaders
I've just finished reading Thomas Merton's Contemplation in a World of Action. Wow! What a book! I've always been a fan of Merton (The Sign of Jonas has been a long favorite). But some of this stuff is beathtaking. Now I have a question for the ex-monastics. I'm genuinely puzzled because I remember that Been There, I think it was among others, mentioned that Mrinalini Mata was a fan of Merton's and of this book. Another ex-monk mentioned that Bro. Ramananda liked Contemplation in a World of Action. If someone like Mrinalini Mata liked this book, how is it that she or other SRF leaders who might have liked Merton's ideas wouldn't go along with the reforms the monastics were trying to institute? Most of the book is about monastic renewal and reform, and Merton was sensitive to many of the problems and issues that appear to have been at play in the SRF ashrams. I could go on about his theses, but I can't resist quoting a passage or two--you'll get the idea. Forgive me these lengthy quotations, but I think you'll agree these passages (and there are dozens more like them) are brilliant. And not only do they apply for the monastic, they apply to us householders as well.

Quote:

The postulant who has come to the monastery looking for something may not necessarily be looking for what we think. Yes, of course, si revera Deum quaerit. "Does he truly seek God?" But what entitles me, as novice master, to imagine that my particular way of seeking God is the only way possible and that my spirituality, my prayer, my idiosyncrasies, my monastic likes and dislikes, my interpretations, are normative for all monks of all time? Such an assumption teaches, louder than any words, that I have no humility myself and am therefore disqualified from trying to teach it to another. I do not have the elementary humility to respect his own personal integrity, his uniqueness, his differences, his own singular and personal need. p. 96-97

One who dedicates himself to God by vows today finds himself committed for life to a massively organized, rigidly formalistic institutional existence. Here everything is decided for him beforehand. Everything is provided for by rule and system. Initiative is not only discouraged, it becomes useless. Questions cease to have any point, for you already know the answers, since they imply a firm decision to ignore your questions. Obedience then no longer consists in dedicating ones's will and love to the service of God, but almost in the renunciation of human rights, needs and feelings in order to conform to the rigid demands of an institution. The institution is identified with God and becomes an end in itself. ...the young monk who has serious problems with a life that may seem to him increasingly fruitless and even absurd, may be forcefully told that he is failing in Christian faith and verging on apostasy!...

The most tragic misunderstandings have arisen from this attitude which, in some cases, one must frankly admit it, savors of gross superstition and arrogance. In any event, it has led to the ruin of many monastic vocations which seemed to be in every respect serious and genuine. One feels that if there had been a little flexibility, a little humaneness shown--if the monk, when he began to have trouble with the life, had been allowed a change of scene or a more genuinely human relationship with his brothers--he might have adjusted to the life after all. Unfortunately, there still exists such a grave fear of the austere institutional image being tarnished by concessions that vocations are sacrificed in order to preserve a monastic facade. p. 20-21

The endemic disease of monasteries and of sects is that people in them do so much to save their souls that they lose them: not in the sense that they are damned for being good, but in the sense that they concentrate on such particular, limited aspects of good that they become perverse and singular. This singularity begets blindness and deafness to Christ. The tense concentration of sect or monastery on some completely peripheral concern can give an impression of heroic faith--but so can the feat of engraving the Lord's Prayer on a pinhead. Fidelity to tedious but predictable rule can become an easy substitute for fidelity, in openess and risk, to the unpredictable word. But the whole point of monastic "desert" life is precisely to equip the monk for risk, for walking with God in the wilderness and wrestling with Satan in vulnerable freedom.


My God, it's great stuff! My soul sings. Master would love it. There is a fearless man! And now, without meaning to be disrespectful, I paraphrase the words of Mrinalini Mata herself: "When will Master send those who can lead?"


(FWIW, "chuckle" was taken by someone on another board when I went to register; hence the new name)

Edited by: chuckle chela at: 3/24/02 11:26:13 pm
KS
Registered User
(3/25/02 7:07 am)
Reply
When will Master send those who will lead!
Great "quote". I totally feel the same way. The leadership is anything but leadership.

However, I think the message is that we are all looking in the wrong direction. A strong central controlling organization is not what Master has in mind. Can the signs be any clearer? If they were not fighting His will in their direction for the organization would they meet this much resistance? Would such poor leaders have been chosen to lead?

No.

As other posts have mentioned, I think the smaller groups with people really living the life is the way Master wants it. Those groups are successful. We should open our eyes and see what is working.

X Insider
Registered User
(3/25/02 3:07 pm)
Reply
Re: When will Master send those who will lead!
Yes, the Merton book is wonderful. I remember hearing or reading on this board that Mrinalini Mata likes Merton. I don't recall anyone saying that she liked this particular book, however! Or maybe she could read it an interpret it far differently than the former Spiritual Life Committees did.

I found it comforting to read Merton's finding that periodic upheavals happen in every monastic order. And in one section he said something like (this is a paraphrase) "there is a temptation, because this is such a difficult endeavor, to turn tail and run. But don't do it - this is God's work and it must be done." Many of us wish we had been able to hold up, to manage to stay and keep trying to make the ashram a truly loving place. But when the leadership did as Merton predicted and rolled back any positive changes, refusing two-way communication, it was just too painful to remain.

Yes, it is a wonderful book.

<< Prev Topic | Next Topic >>

Add Reply

Email This To a Friend Email This To a Friend
Topic Control Image Topic Commands
Click to receive email notification of replies Click to receive email notification of replies
Click to stop receiving email notification of replies Click to stop receiving email notification of replies
jump to:

- SRF Walrus - Treatment of Members/Monastics -



Powered By ezboardŽ Ver. 7.32
Copyright Š1999-2005 ezboard, Inc.